Skip to main content

                                                             

Ms. Sarah Lim                                                  Mr. Gerald Cheong
Legal Associate (Corporate Practice)            Director, Corporate Finance Department
T: (65) 6322 2254                                            T: (65) 6322 2221
F: (65) 6534 0833                                            F: (65) 6534 0833
E: sarahlim@loopartners.com.sg                 E: geraldcheong@loopartners.com.sg

Loo & Partners LLP
143 Cecil Street, Level Ten, GB Building
Singapore 069542
www.loopartners.com.sg

On 6 July 2015, the Securities Industry Council (“SIC”) issued a consultation paper on proposed changes to the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers (the “Code”).

The Code was introduced in 1974 and is currently being reviewed to take into account market developments and international practices that have occurred since its last revision in 2012.

A summary of some key proposed changes to the Code is set out below.

(i) Offerors to be bound by timetable in a competitive offer situation

For clarity purposes, it is proposed that the Code be revised to state that in a competitive offer situation, all offerors will be bound by the timetable established by the despatch of the last competing offer document.

(ii) Adoption of a default auction procedure

It is proposed that a default auction procedure be adopted, codified, and made applicable in the absence of alternative procedures if a competitive situation continues to exist in the later stages of the offer period.

(iii) Clarification by potential competing offerors of their intention

It is proposed that guidance be added to the Code as to when a potential competing offeror has to clarify its intention and how i.e. by either announcing a firm intention to make an offer or making a no intention to bid statement.

(iv) Clarifications regarding the conduct of the board of the offeree company

It is proposed that the conduct of the board of the offeree company be clarified such that soliciting a competing offer or running a sale process will not amount to frustration of the initial offer, and that an offeree board may consider sharing available management projections and forecasts with the independent financial adviser.

(v) Adoption of a 7-business day settlement period

It is proposed that the current settlement period of “10-calendar day” be replaced with “7-business day”.

(vi) Prompt disclosure

It is proposed that Rule 8.1 of the Code be amended to require prompt disclosure of any material changes to information previously published in connection with an offer, and any material new information which would have been required to be disclosed during an offer period.

Practitioners should continue to keep abreast of impending changes to the Code.

Related Articles

RANKINGS: ALB Asia Top 50 Largest Law Firms 2024

In an era of global uncertainty, the legal industry in Asia is experiencing significant shifts, with the size and scale of law firms becoming crucial factors in their ability to serve clients effectively.

RANKING: Fast 30: Asia’s Fastest Growing Firms 2024

As the legal landscape in Asia evolves rapidly, an increasing number of law firms are capitalizing on the region's economic growth by adopting innovative technologies and strategic approaches to meet the demands of a more interconnected global market.

OFFSHORE OUTLOOK: 2025

by Nimitt Dixit |

In the coming year, offshore centres will have to balance privacy and transparency as they adapt to new financial trends, lawyers say.