Skip to main content

A review into the procurement of Commonwealth legal services seeks to align how government agencies outsource legal work with how private sector does, in a bid to minimise the federal government’s legal spend, which last year hit a high of A$555m.

“The report finds that the current system of agencies individually tendering for legal services is very costly both to the Commonwealth and to external service providers,” Attorney-General Robert McClelland said. “The review puts forward a number of recommendations which the Government will consider carefully as part of our commitment to closely monitor legal services expenditure and achieve greater value for taxpayers’ money.”

Of the A$555m spent on legal services by government agencies, almost A$308m was spent on purchasing services from external legal service providers. The balance of $247m was largely attributed to the cost of in-house practices.

While government legal spend in the past decade has increased 285% – from A$144m in 1999 to A$555m in 2009 – the report notes that most of the expense is a result of significant changes in government policy including the development and implementation of national competition policy, whereby former monopolies are either exposed to competition or regulated in a manner designed to emulate what would occur in a competitive market.

Increased transparency and accountability of government agencies has also increased demand for legal services with the development of “well-informed and well-funded community and commercial bodies able and willing to challenge government actions.”

Authors of the report Anthony Blunn and Sibylle Krieger interviewed private sector organisations and determined that a more structured way of deciding what work would be conducted in-house and what work should be farmed out to a panel would be effective for use in government agencies. When work is outsourced, the report said that government agencies should more rigorously seek to negotiate the best price for legal work.

“Key to best practice in private-sector organisations is a clear definition and understanding of the role of in-house lawyers, a sound knowledge of the market from which external services are purchased, and the ability and willingness to cost work rigorously and negotiate strongly on the basis of that costing with both external providers and internal clients as appropriate,” the report said. “Finally that ability to rigorously cost work and knowledge of the market has enabled a number of private sector organisations to experiment with different models of service delivery, including alliance-like models in which risks and rewards are shared more openly than is the norm in Commonwealth legal services procurement.”

Commonwealth legal spend breakdown
FY Internal (A$m) External (A$m) Total (A$m)
1999 29 114 143
2000 133 175 308
2001 138 164 302
2002 178 185 363
2003 204 205 409
2004 230 216 446
2005 N/A N/A N/A
2006 106 207 313
2007 126 280 406
2008 182 311 493
2009 247 308 555

Related Articles

Japanese firm TMI forms alliance with Australia’s JWS, eyes Sydney office

by Sarah Wong |

Japanese law firm TMI Associates has established a strategic alliance with Australia’s Johnson Winter Slattery (JWS) marking the first partnership of its kind between major law firms from these two nations.

Clifford Chance launches Shanghai FTZ joint operation with local firm

by Charlie Wu 吴卓言 |

Magic Circle firm Clifford Chance and Shanghai He Ping Law Firm have established a joint operation office in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (FTZ), following approval from the Shanghai Justice Bureau.

SUBMISSION OPEN: ALB Firms to Watch (Thailand) 2025

Submissions are now open for ALB’s Thailand Firms to Watch 2025. This list will highlight the most promising and innovative law firms in Indonesia that are making a mark in the legal industry. The list will be published in the December 2025 issue of ALB Asia.